
Knowing that I'm a Mets fan, this co-worker sought me out and asked, "What ever happened to that guy?"
You see, we've been conditioned to believe that something otherworldly must have taken place to account for Green's steady decline. The way his career progressed, and subsequently ended, just didn't seem, well, what's the word...natural.
Let's do some very rudimentary statistical analysis:
AGE/HR/RBI/SLUG
- 1995 - 22/15/54/.509
- 1996 - 23/11/45/.448
- 1997 - 24/16/53/.469
- 1998 - 25/35/100/.510
- 1999 - 26/42/123/.588
- 2000 - 27/24/99/.472*
- 2001 - 28/49/125/.598
- 2002 - 29/42/114/.558
- 2003 - 30/19/85/.460
- 2004 - 31/28/86/.459
- 2005 - 32/22/73/.477
- 2006 - 33/15/66/.432
- 2007 - 34/10/46/.430
*note - 2000 was the first year of his big deal in LA and I guess he was "trying to do too much", which is the most reasonable explaination for his numbers being a bit lower than the year before and after
When you glance at the numbers quickly, what do you discover? You see that his career can be divided up into three distinct sections: his early increase in skills/ability, his 'prime' and his 'decline'. Hmm, very curious. I thought that once a player reached his 'prime', he just continued on at that pace until he decided he no longer wished to unleash his talents on the world? That doesn't seem to be the case here, though. Again, something strange is going on...
Oh, now I remember. All those guys that were capable of playing above and beyond normal ability were on 'roids! When mortal men age they gradually get slower and less agile and lose some of their youthful ability and responsiveness. That means they can't get as many hits. I guess Shawn didn't take steroids. Good for him.


4 comments:
also - loooooves matzah, hannukah and dredles. and seriously, can you blame the guy?
And yarmulkes with the Mets symbol on it.
/hates Shawn Green
//nothing else substantive to say
A story on Shawn Green not doing steroids...could there be a less interesting topic than that?
Post a Comment